E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM General Implementation Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old October 14th, 2008   #2
prwatE120
Task Group Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
Default

As support for Queued Messages is not mandated, you possibly have to decide based on whether your reponder supports that PID.

I think we need to propose a scheme whereby requests that are initially met by an ACK_TIMER can be serviced by a subsequent request within a known "time to live" period.

You ask for something not immediately available - and are are given an ACK_TIMER xxx. If you ask again within (say) 10 xxx you are handed the requested data. If you ask after that time it is deemed to be stale and yiu get another ACK_TIMER.

And yes, if your responder supports QUEUED_MESSAGES, it can get added to the list of pending messages.

mroe discussion needed ...

Peter Willis
prwatE120 is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ACK_TIMER, QUEUED Messages berntd RDM Interpretation Questions 1 November 12th, 2008 10:02 PM
ACK_TIMER Example Error prwatE120 RDM Interpretation Questions 1 December 26th, 2006 03:46 PM
Request in the middle of ACK_TIMER endoftheworld RDM Interpretation Questions 1 July 13th, 2006 10:53 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.