For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method? - E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

		E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM General Implementation Discussion
For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method?

RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product.

Search this Thread

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

September 28th, 2025	#2
sblair Administrator Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 441	Welcome to the RDM forums. Depending on the design of your product I would suggest you'll have the best user experience by periodically caching the information that may be requested so that it is available to immediately reply via RDM. If you do choose to use the ACK_TIMER method then I would definitely recommend supporting QUEUED_MESSAGE also. Scott __________________ Scott M. Blair RDM Protocol Forums Admin

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
RDM 1.37-5 Schema "different_pid" used in QUEUED_MESSAGE not part of Schema	Qasi_	RDM Interpretation Questions	3	September 18th, 2024 07:54 PM
DMXter4 says "not responding"	dj41354	RDM General Implementation Discussion	11	November 27th, 2015 06:59 AM
New PID "Slot Labels"	este_	RDM General Implementation Discussion	5	August 14th, 2014 09:26 AM
New PID "CURVE DEFINITION"	este_	RDM General Implementation Discussion	0	July 13th, 2014 03:16 PM
Refreshing "parameter_description" ?	theguenni	RDM General Implementation Discussion	0	February 29th, 2012 02:36 PM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 PM.