Sub device field handling - E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

		E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Interpretation Questions
Sub device field handling

RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard.

Search this Thread

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

July 30th, 2024	#2
ericthegeek Task Group Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 390	That is the correct interpretation in my view. If a responder has no sub-devices, it should NACK any request that has a non-zero sub-device field. The NACK Reason Code should be NR_SUB_DEVICE_OUT_OF_RANGE

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Handling incorrect messages	eldoMS	RDM General Implementation Discussion	7	September 2nd, 2011 01:55 PM
Correctly handling ACK_OVERFLOW	nomis52	RDM General Implementation Discussion	13	January 29th, 2011 09:25 PM
ACK_TIMER Handling	ericthegeek	RDM General Implementation Discussion	8	January 20th, 2011 08:15 PM
Command Class / Parameter ID mismatch handling	dangeross	RDM Interpretation Questions	2	April 16th, 2009 01:39 PM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 PM.