E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM General Implementation Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old March 5th, 2019   #1
sblair
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
Send a message via AIM to sblair Send a message via MSN to sblair
Default

Keep in mind too that the TDR testing ESTA did as part of qualifying CAT5 cabling years ago shows that there is significant discontinuities caused by each connector, so ultimately this will be a practical limit far before the theoretical driver chip limit.

I proved it in our QC labs at HES many times by connecting (20) 5 foot cables together and you'd get tons of reflections compared to just using a single cable 100 foot cable.
__________________
Scott M. Blair
RDM Protocol Forums Admin
sblair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 5th, 2019   #2
majid
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Turkiye
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sblair View Post
I proved it in our QC labs at HES many times by connecting (20) 5 foot cables together and you'd get tons of reflections compared to just using a single cable 100 foot cable.
Thanks for comments Scott.
According to your test results, our 32 fixtures chain is already fragile more due to 32 sockets connection rather than unit loads.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericthegeek View Post
Yes, it's still a good idea to use repeaters. Connecting all 170 of them on a single segment would be a terrible idea. Limiting each segment to about 32 devices is still a good rule of thumb for the reasons that Scott mentioned. But you can go higher under certain conditions (good cable, excellent connectors, etc.).
Exactly, I beleive even a blind repeater (without signal regeneration) would be useful to renew signal and reduce signal reflection which Scott mentioned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericthegeek View Post
I'm counting individual contacts. 170 devices with 3 wires each (Data+, Data-, and Common) = 510 connections.
You are right, I got it now!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericthegeek View Post
I believe the one I worked on years ago is still available. I don't like to promote products here so please contact me outside the forum.
Sure, I will contact you for more details soon
Thanks.
majid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 5th, 2019   #3
sblair
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
Send a message via AIM to sblair Send a message via MSN to sblair
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by majid View Post
Thanks for comments Scott.
According to your test results, our 32 fixtures chain is already fragile more due to 32 sockets connection rather than unit loads.
Yes, this has always been my belief from past experiences coupled with the TDR tests ESTA did many years ago studying the effects of difference cables types and connections.

Those studies can be found here: https://tsp.esta.org/tsp/working_gro...XoverCat5.html
__________________
Scott M. Blair
RDM Protocol Forums Admin
sblair is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opto isolatated repeater for RDM BSmith RDM User Discussion 3 November 7th, 2017 10:17 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.