|
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 8th, 2018
|
#2 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
  |
Welcome to the forums. There are a number of people here that have implemented Proxies so they can help answer your questions. Technically for a Proxy you just have to set the flag and support the two PROXY messages above. However there may be controllers out there that don't fully implement support properly for Proxies so I believe what a number of them do is to also "spoof" discovery for the devices they are proxying for. To do that you would respond to the Discovery UNIQUE_BRANCH messages for each of the devices you proxy as well as the MUTE and UNMUTE messages. This way they get discovered by a controller just like any other non-proxy device.
Each device represented by a UID whether it is a proxied or non-proxied device needs to support the PIDs listed in the Minimum Support list in the Appendix. Scott
__________________
Scott M. Blair  RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Proxy | dezelectric | RDM Interpretation Questions | 3 | July 20th, 2011 12:29 PM |
| Uniquely defining the RDM response of devices | Andy Macdonald | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 6 | February 9th, 2009 02:24 PM |
| Multi-devices or sub-devices | Fokko | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | December 1st, 2006 11:10 AM |
| Any RDM Responder Devices out there yet? | sblair | RDM Marketplace Discussion | 8 | September 20th, 2006 06:03 AM |
Threaded Mode