![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#4 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 390
|
To answer your specific question:
In my controllers, I allow: 1: Break followed by a proper RDM Response 2: Multiple breaks followed by a proper RDM Response 3: Data Bytes, followed by one or more breaks, followed by a proper RDM Response I do not support: 4: Break -> Non RDM Data -> Break -> Proper RDM Response 5: Proper RDM Response without a break Conditions 4 and 5 will ignore the response, retry a few times, and then give up and log an error. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Request Call for New PIDs! | sblair | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 0 | January 27th, 2014 01:44 PM |
| RDM Master UID assignment question | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 4 | May 30th, 2012 10:14 PM |
| Master list of RDM Product IDs | pkirkup | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | July 29th, 2009 10:33 AM |
| Master Fader accross Rdm implementation Question | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | May 9th, 2008 12:12 AM |
| Request in the middle of ACK_TIMER | endoftheworld | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | July 13th, 2006 10:53 PM |