![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 |
|
Administrator
|
Agree with Eric here. The only logical thing to respond in the NACK with is QM.
__________________
Scott M. Blair ![]() RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| E1.37-1 RDM Message Extensions document in Public Review | sblair | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 2 | December 13th, 2010 03:11 PM |
| Status Message Markers | hamish | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 4 | December 9th, 2010 11:12 PM |
| Additional Status Message ID request? | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 3 | October 28th, 2009 07:28 PM |