![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
|
It's responders that respond, not the controller.
It may be that your controller is behaving as a responder. Responders will respond with ACK_TIMER if they require additional time to process the response. Quote:
__________________
______________________________________________ Hamish Dumbreck |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
A controller has it's own UID, used in all commands to responders. Responses to the controller are addressed to the controller by it's UID.
There's nothing, that I'm aware of in the standard, to prevent a controller acting as a responder on receipt of a command.
__________________
______________________________________________ Hamish Dumbreck |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UID / EUID convertor | nomis52 | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 0 | May 16th, 2015 11:50 AM |
| DISC_UNIQUE_BRANCH dest UID (section 7.3) | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 5 | October 15th, 2008 09:06 PM |