![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
Eric.
Thanks for pointing out the error in my last, referring to a root device when I really meant a sub-device ![]() I'm trying to figure out what trap I'm going to fall in to if I drive a coach and horses through the standard by wilfully disregarding the shall statement. Usually, there is a good reason that I've not considered...
__________________
______________________________________________ Hamish Dumbreck |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ACT_TIMER to Set messages | nic123 | RDM Interpretation Questions | 3 | April 18th, 2014 12:01 PM |
| Relative frequency of UID set changes to RDM messages events | nomis52 | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 6 | July 6th, 2010 10:02 PM |
| Sub-device response to SET/GET DMX512 start address | p_richart | RDM Interpretation Questions | 2 | September 29th, 2006 09:27 AM |