![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 | |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 390
|
Quote:
It's also a bad idea. It will probably work most of the time, but could cause problems in systems that have multi-port proxies, mergers, or multi-port responders. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Relative frequency of UID set changes to RDM messages events | nomis52 | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 6 | July 6th, 2010 10:02 PM |
| Master list of RDM Product IDs | pkirkup | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | July 29th, 2009 10:33 AM |
| DISC_UNIQUE_BRANCH dest UID (section 7.3) | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 5 | October 15th, 2008 09:06 PM |
| Master Fader accross Rdm implementation Question | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | May 9th, 2008 12:12 AM |