![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#6 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
|
In essence YES - even if the spec is "broken". It is the spec, warts and all, and is the only common reference we have!
In the example you cite, the capture file is evidence of a non-compliant device. Peter |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PID = SUPPORTED_PARAMTERS / PARAMTER_DESCRIPTION question | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 14 | February 9th, 2015 03:54 PM |
| CAPTURE_PRESET pdl? | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | October 19th, 2009 09:52 PM |
| PDL size and manufacturer specific parameter ID's | jamie | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 5 | July 13th, 2009 12:31 AM |
| Is there a minimum required PID list for sub-devices? | p_richart | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | November 7th, 2008 01:04 PM |