|
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
September 2nd, 2011
|
#1 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
  |
As has been said, there is a balance. My own design philosophy is to make it as generally forgiving as possible. This in itself doesn't force non-compliant products to behave better, but it does at least help the end-user accomplish what they need to.
As said, the end-user is unlikely to understand or blame the proper product that is the non-compliant one when they are faced with issues anyway.
__________________
Scott M. Blair  RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Correctly handling ACK_OVERFLOW | nomis52 | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 13 | January 29th, 2011 09:25 PM |
| ACK_TIMER Handling | ericthegeek | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 8 | January 20th, 2011 08:15 PM |
| Command Class / Parameter ID mismatch handling | dangeross | RDM Interpretation Questions | 2 | April 16th, 2009 01:39 PM |
Hybrid Mode
