RDM Discovery packets - E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

head_up · March 18th, 2011

Thanks, ericthegeek, u rescue me from long hours cursing!

Today's question is ( the beer is from me

) :
For now i can't support E120_QUEUED_MESSAGE (not listed in E120_SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS respond), but i will add support later, for now the controller is sending to me requests which are with PD 0x02 (E120_STATUS_ADVISORY !? why this ?! ) at ~1 sec. I'm not sure, but i think this is like "Are u here?". Is this correct? For now i'm answering with NACK - but the controller continue to send me this requests... is this problem or i must respond with STATUS_MESSAGES with a PDL of 0x00?

I thing support of queued messages is absolutely mandatory for proxy device, but for now i can't add it (for some other reason). When i must respond the list of devices and the list is too long for single message - can i use for now E120_RESPONSE_TYPE_ACK_OVERFLOW ? i think this is very close to E120_QUEUED_MESSAGE support about this data stream.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Captured RDM packets	chris	RDM General Implementation Discussion	2	February 11th, 2009 02:02 PM
Time between controller packets	Dan Scheurell	RDM Timing Discussion	1	April 1st, 2007 11:38 PM

March 18th, 2011	#10
head_up Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 7	Thanks, ericthegeek, u rescue me from long hours cursing! Today's question is ( the beer is from me ) : For now i can't support E120_QUEUED_MESSAGE (not listed in E120_SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS respond), but i will add support later, for now the controller is sending to me requests which are with PD 0x02 (E120_STATUS_ADVISORY !? why this ?! ) at ~1 sec. I'm not sure, but i think this is like "Are u here?". Is this correct? For now i'm answering with NACK - but the controller continue to send me this requests... is this problem or i must respond with STATUS_MESSAGES with a PDL of 0x00? I thing support of queued messages is absolutely mandatory for proxy device, but for now i can't add it (for some other reason). When i must respond the list of devices and the list is too long for single message - can i use for now E120_RESPONSE_TYPE_ACK_OVERFLOW ? i think this is very close to E120_QUEUED_MESSAGE support about this data stream.