Self test description question - E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

hamish · October 28th, 2010

This issue is one that remains open and one I discussed at the thin end of the CPWG on Monday. Anyone who was at the last Plugfest may have witnessed the result of testing for 255 self tests, not a pretty sight.

I propose the addition of PID SUPPORTED_SELFTESTS, being a canned response. At the next revision of the standard, a minimum of "Should" be supported, although I personally would vote for "Shall" be supported, leaving controller developers responsible, as indeed they already are, for the case that that the PID has not been implemented.

Where do we go from here?

October 28th, 2010	#28
hamish Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Dartmoor, Devon, England Posts: 56	Still to be resolved This issue is one that remains open and one I discussed at the thin end of the CPWG on Monday. Anyone who was at the last Plugfest may have witnessed the result of testing for 255 self tests, not a pretty sight. I propose the addition of PID SUPPORTED_SELFTESTS, being a canned response. At the next revision of the standard, a minimum of "Should" be supported, although I personally would vote for "Shall" be supported, leaving controller developers responsible, as indeed they already are, for the case that that the PID has not been implemented. Where do we go from here?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ASN.1 description of RDM	sjackman	RDM General Implementation Discussion	2	September 19th, 2006 10:20 AM