![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
|
Simon
It is a very good question - and as the standard does not explicity state anything, a responder would be best advised to cope with either case. It seems preferable that if the initial GET had a payload (and thus the PDL != 0), this should be repeated in all subsequent GETs until the responder stops replying with the ACK_OVERFLOW. This needs to be documented in the next erratta. Peter |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ACK_TIMER Handling | ericthegeek | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 8 | January 20th, 2011 08:15 PM |
| Command Class / Parameter ID mismatch handling | dangeross | RDM Interpretation Questions | 2 | April 16th, 2009 01:39 PM |