E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Interpretation Questions
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old March 31st, 2010   #21
hamish
Member
 
hamish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmoor, Devon, England
Posts: 56
Send a message via Skype™ to hamish
Default Cardinal Index

A PID SUPPORTED_SELFTESTS would in this case be in lieu of SELFTEST_COUNT so no real difference in overhead.
I make the assumption that any responder supporting many self tests will not see an extra byte of code space for each test as a big overhead, so here I buy into the cardinal approach.

There may be a slight impact on the controller side, but in any case, less than the current arrangement demands.

I make the assumption that we're all in favour of making support for SELFTEST_DESCRIPTION mandatory when PERFORM_SELFTEST is supported.
hamish is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASN.1 description of RDM sjackman RDM General Implementation Discussion 2 September 19th, 2006 10:20 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.