![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 102
|
Hello all,
Thanks for this. Those are the exact issues I have come up with here. If DMX_START_ADDRESS is supported (because the device needs it then how is a controller supposed to know this unless it can detect it with the PARAMTER PIDs? I would have to agree with Scott in that it should be treated as a NON mandatory pid and thus included in the SUPPORTED_PARAMTER -list. Then again, one could argue that if the device does not need DMX_START_ADDRESS, it should respond with a nack reason NR_UNKNOWN_PID. The controller could then make a conclusion from that, in which case Peter's approach will work too. Hmm...Kind regards Bernt |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mute Response Question | sondericker | RDM Interpretation Questions | 13 | January 21st, 2007 10:14 AM |