|
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 1st, 2018
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Oakland, CA, USA
Posts: 23
|
How should a device with footprint=0 respond to setting the DMX start address?
When a device's DMX footprint is 0, what should happen when trying to set the DMX start address? On one hand, the OLA RDM tests say this should return an error. But on the other, setting a start address may be desired if the device is internally set to a new, non-zero, footprint sometime later.
Thoughts? |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to handle DMX Footprint overrun | RobbG | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 3 | May 8th, 2017 08:42 AM |
| change parameter setting | ilek79 | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 4 | January 12th, 2017 09:15 PM |
| Second configurable DMX address | stefkuhb | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 5 | October 22nd, 2014 08:17 AM |
| DMX Addressing when Footprint is Zero | Mark_C | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 8 | January 17th, 2010 10:47 AM |
| Sub-device response to SET/GET DMX512 start address | p_richart | RDM Interpretation Questions | 2 | September 29th, 2006 09:27 AM |
Threaded Mode