![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Administrator
|
Daniel,
It's a fair suggestion. In the past we have gone away from having Identify expire on it's own as it creates a whole host of user issues, especially for someone that has to go hunting for the piece of gear with the blinky light on it compared to the moving light that is in a very obvious strobe and having the identify expire while in the middle of walking around searching for it. The route I expect we would probably take in adding something like this would be to create an additional PID that defines the timeout duration so that devices that support a variable duration can be easily identified by the controller up front rather than through trial and error. There is a new document about to go out for Public Review that adds a whole suite of additional PIDs (BSR E1.37-5) it should be in Public Review by the end of the year. I would suggest putting in a Public Review comment for a new PID for this and anything else you might like to see during the Public Review and it then gets discussed by the entire Task Group and addressed.
__________________
Scott M. Blair ![]() RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 24
|
Our responders use a automatic identify timeout: they do not termi ate identify mode but change from LOUD mode to QUIET mode after three minutes or so to prevent "visible hanging" . Next IDENTIFY ON command will then invoke LOUD mode again (when enabled). Maybe this could be a solution to your problem.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|