|
|
|||||||
| RDM Timing Discussion Discussion and questions relating to the timing requirements of RDM. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
August 19th, 2011
|
#1 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
  |
As Eric said, NACK:NR_PROXY_BUFFER_FULL was specifically intended to allow Gateways/Bridges the ability to tell the Controller they have too many pending commands already to handle any more.
__________________
Scott M. Blair  RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
|
August 21st, 2011
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
|
Hi Scott/Eric
Would this be NR_BUFFER_FULL (0x0007), or has a new NR_PROXY_BUFFER_FULL be added after E1.20? Greetings Marc |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is there a minimum required PID list for sub-devices? | p_richart | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | November 7th, 2008 01:04 PM |
| broadcast Disvovery Mute/Unute | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 2 | April 8th, 2008 10:07 PM |
Hybrid Mode
