|
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
November 27th, 2009
|
#1 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
|
Scott has cleary quoted the standard. Note that there are two SHALL statements and one SHOULD.
I have yet to see manufacturers follow the recommendation about selecting a category from Table A-3 and adding the offset of 0x8000, so please DO NOT make any assumptions ... regards Peter Willis |
|
|
|
November 29th, 2009
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 102
|
Hello,
Thank yopu Scott, Peter. Ok, so the PID is unique to the manufaturer code and not the model code. That is easy and makes sense. I do not understand the adding of offset x8000 to a pid from table A-3. Surely if table A-3 has something that fits, we should just use that instead of a cutom pid? Kind regards Bernt |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PDL size and manufacturer specific parameter ID's | jamie | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 5 | July 13th, 2009 12:31 AM |
| RDM Discovery - Effect of Manufacturer IDs | zshenker | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 4 | April 10th, 2009 02:30 PM |
Hybrid Mode
