![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 390
|
There are already responders in the wild that don't support the DMX_START_ADDRESS PID. Even if it were to be made mandatory in a future version of the document, controllers would still have to handle devices that don't support it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Treviso, Italy
Posts: 21
|
Hello!
I have a doubt: if I have only required parameters in my RDM implementation, do I have to respond to a GET_COMMAND SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS request from controller? And if the answer is YES, is this the reason for 0x00 in PDL (page 54 of standard)? Thank you. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mute Response Question | sondericker | RDM Interpretation Questions | 13 | January 21st, 2007 10:14 AM |