![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15
|
It should be noted that ACN and RDM are both likely to be around for a long time (as is DMX512-A). ACN will NOT make RDM oboslete. Both of the new protocols have their place and great pains have been taken to make sure that the two have some possability of working together as is evidenced by the various RDM/ACN bridge products.
At this point in time, it is less difficult and less expensive to implement RDM. Also, practical issues such as cable run length and connector reliability favor RDM. For extermely large scale systems with tens of thousands of end devices, ACN is very practical. In my typical situations which involve 1 - 16 universes of DMX, RDM is still my choice. Regards, Milton Davis |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8
|
I am slightly confused, i have been reading up on ACN but have not found the answer to this question
Is ACN a replacement DMX-over-ethernet standard, simply to provide a universal? Or is it a new layout based on TCP/IP? Probably a simple question Rob |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|