How should a device with footprint=0 respond to setting the DMX start address? - E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

		E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Interpretation Questions
How should a device with footprint=0 respond to setting the DMX start address?

RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard.

Search this Thread

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

December 15th, 2018	#11
mikemac Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2018 Location: Arizona Posts: 1	Why a NACK and not an ACK? Since the footprint is zero, the device isn't going to use any slots so it really shouldn't matter what the DMX address is set to. I would think returning a NACK to a controller could confuse it as it thinks it is sending a valid request.

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How to handle DMX Footprint overrun	RobbG	RDM General Implementation Discussion	3	May 8th, 2017 08:42 AM
change parameter setting	ilek79	RDM General Implementation Discussion	4	January 12th, 2017 09:15 PM
Second configurable DMX address	stefkuhb	RDM General Implementation Discussion	5	October 22nd, 2014 08:17 AM
DMX Addressing when Footprint is Zero	Mark_C	RDM General Implementation Discussion	8	January 17th, 2010 10:47 AM
Sub-device response to SET/GET DMX512 start address	p_richart	RDM Interpretation Questions	2	September 29th, 2006 09:27 AM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37 PM.