![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 |
|
Administrator
|
Do you know where the other data is coming from? Solving that would be my first priority. You basically have 2 options in how to handle this. You can either just reject the response and send the request again. Or, if the timing is right and you can get a clean response out that you can parse and passes the checksum then you could accept the response. Of course if you are trying to parse it you definitely want to verify the checksum and bounds check the other fields to make sure they appear valid.
__________________
Scott M. Blair ![]() RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Request Call for New PIDs! | sblair | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 0 | January 27th, 2014 01:44 PM |
| RDM Master UID assignment question | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 4 | May 30th, 2012 10:14 PM |
| Master list of RDM Product IDs | pkirkup | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | July 29th, 2009 10:33 AM |
| Master Fader accross Rdm implementation Question | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | May 9th, 2008 12:12 AM |
| Request in the middle of ACK_TIMER | endoftheworld | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | July 13th, 2006 10:53 PM |