E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Timing Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

RDM Timing Discussion Discussion and questions relating to the timing requirements of RDM.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old August 19th, 2011   #6
sblair
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
Send a message via AIM to sblair Send a message via MSN to sblair
Default

As Eric said, NACK:NR_PROXY_BUFFER_FULL was specifically intended to allow Gateways/Bridges the ability to tell the Controller they have too many pending commands already to handle any more.
__________________
Scott M. Blair
RDM Protocol Forums Admin
sblair is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there a minimum required PID list for sub-devices? p_richart RDM Interpretation Questions 4 November 7th, 2008 01:04 PM
broadcast Disvovery Mute/Unute berntd RDM Interpretation Questions 2 April 8th, 2008 10:07 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.