|
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 1st, 2025
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Treviso, Italy
Posts: 21
|
Hello,
On page 55 of the standard in reference to SUPPORTED PARAMETERS PID it is written: "Manufacturer specific PIDs may or may not be included in the response". If I have implemented a MANUFACTURER SPECIFIC PID in my device, I need to list it otherwise the controller has no other way of knowing about its existence. Am I right? And what about the STATUS_ID_DESCRIPTION of a MANUFACTURER SPECIFIC message? How does the controller know in advance the implemented STATUS ID to be able to request its description? Does it request it a posteriori? Thanks |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SubDevice Required PIDs | LarryDew | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | March 25th, 2014 08:27 PM |
| Subdevice labelling question | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 13 | August 15th, 2013 11:13 PM |
| Self test description question | sondericker | RDM Interpretation Questions | 28 | November 2nd, 2010 10:31 PM |
| Command Class / Parameter ID mismatch handling | dangeross | RDM Interpretation Questions | 2 | April 16th, 2009 01:39 PM |
| ASN.1 description of RDM | sjackman | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 2 | September 19th, 2006 10:20 AM |
Threaded Mode