E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM General Implementation Discussion

RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old April 20th, 2021   #7
peternewman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: London
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thierry Dupont View Post
Thank you Peter to spend some time looking at our issue.
No problem



Quote:
Originally Posted by Thierry Dupont View Post
Personality for a 16 bit Dimmer:


In our example above (which is implemented as it is) regarding the Secondary should we have?
Slot Label ID [0x0001, (1)], Intensity
or Slot Label ID [0x0000, (0)]

Currently we have Slot Label ID [0x0000, (0)]
Yes that's correct. It's a secondary slot, so the Slot Label ID should be a reference to the offset of the slot that's it's primary.


I should probably have explained before, with OLA installed that pretty printed output, which I'd hope makes it pretty self-explanatory if it's correct or not, is as easy as:
Code:
ola_rdm_get -u <UNIVERSE> --uid <UID> slot_info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thierry Dupont View Post
We meant two secondary values as timing / one for duty cycle and one for frequency. The responder that we worked with cannot handle very well secondary.
Yeah, so the challenge seems to be that those channels have to be secondary so you can't say it's strobe. How do you actually turn the strobe on and off, a certain part of the intensity channel, or another one, or just have a frequency of 0 Hz and a duty cycle of 100%?



I'd probably have a primary of SD_STROBE and a secondary of ST_SEC_TIMING or ST_SEC_SPEED for the other channel.



I assume you meant the controller you worked with?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Thierry Dupont View Post
We learnt the hard way recently that it is not because it is wrtitten that a responder support a specific PID that it is working as the standard says.
Yes, listing a PID in SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS is one thing, actually making it usable and useful is quite another!
peternewman is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Responder Packet Timing issue berntd RDM Timing Discussion 10 May 27th, 2015 12:40 AM
New PID "Slot Labels" este_ RDM General Implementation Discussion 5 August 14th, 2014 09:26 AM
PARAMETER_DESCRIPTION data type semantics tim_ecue RDM Interpretation Questions 4 October 14th, 2009 10:47 AM
Slot Label Code anstein RDM General Implementation Discussion 1 August 10th, 2006 02:06 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.