How should a device with footprint=0 respond to setting the DMX start address? - E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

peternewman · December 16th, 2018

I'm just going to echo part of my earlier post:

Quote:

Originally Posted by peternewman

To me, NR_DATA_OUT_OF_RANGE sounds ideal, from the RDM standard description "Value for given Parameter out of allowable range or not supported.".

The asymmetry there is no different to almost every other PID.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sblair

The other scenario is that the general view is that a device shouldn't ACK something unless the action has been completed.

Devil's advocate, should it ACK a SET of 0xFFFF?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How to handle DMX Footprint overrun	RobbG	RDM General Implementation Discussion	3	May 8th, 2017 08:42 AM
change parameter setting	ilek79	RDM General Implementation Discussion	4	January 12th, 2017 09:15 PM
Second configurable DMX address	stefkuhb	RDM General Implementation Discussion	5	October 22nd, 2014 08:17 AM
DMX Addressing when Footprint is Zero	Mark_C	RDM General Implementation Discussion	8	January 17th, 2010 10:47 AM
Sub-device response to SET/GET DMX512 start address	p_richart	RDM Interpretation Questions	2	September 29th, 2006 09:27 AM