![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#9 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Treviso, Italy
Posts: 21
|
The issue is the third line:
- otherwise, if there are status messages at or above the requested level (see table 10-1) that have not been collected, return one or more status messages. In my implementation I have DMX status situation regarded as an ADVISORY STATUS and it is always present. So, if I have not pending messages, and I still receive GET_QUEUED_MESSAGEs with ADVISORY_STATUS, must I send it only once and then return a status message response with PDL of 0 ? I don't think so. Thank you Zano_villa Last edited by zano_villa; January 28th, 2014 at 07:57 AM. Reason: Best explanation |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RDM & DMX frames multiplexing | DavidR | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 2 | November 20th, 2010 04:10 AM |
| QUEUED_MESSAGE - ? | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 9 | November 24th, 2009 08:48 AM |
| capture & playback preset | chris | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | August 4th, 2009 05:45 PM |
| Personality & Subdevices | kocurr | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | July 8th, 2008 09:30 PM |