E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Interpretation Questions

RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old November 6th, 2008   #2
prwatE120
Task Group Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
Default

I would concur that every RDM device must have at least 1 personality.

There is no requirement that the personality has a non zero dmx footprint.

Thus I would support the view that the device info field should never appear to have a personality/number of personalities of 0x0000 or 0x0100.

"Discoverable devices" such as splitters that have no dmx footprint should still have at least a single personality. Some, such as the Pathway unit, have several modes of operation and thus the potential for multiple personalities.

It is true that a device that has no DMX footprint will not be correctly discovered by the DFD Remote Addressing Device (RAD) - but this is really a problem for the RAD to resolve, and should not generate any requirement for splitters to have spoof dmx footprints.

Peter Willis
prwatE120 is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Personality & Subdevices kocurr RDM General Implementation Discussion 1 July 8th, 2008 09:30 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.