E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM General Implementation Discussion

RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old November 3rd, 2008   #2
sblair
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
Send a message via AIM to sblair Send a message via MSN to sblair
Default

Steve,

I'm not aware of any IP (patents) that are at issue. I have not heard of any discussion or potential issues of IP that are blocking RDM implementation for a number of years now. The majority of the IP was held by HES, but it was openly put on the table for use in ESTA developing RDM. I'm not aware of any IP licensing requirements by anyone.

Any manufacturer can implement as many or as few messages in RDM as they choose, so yes it is possible to have an implementation that only supports something like Getting/Setting DMX Address.
__________________
Scott M. Blair
RDM Protocol Forums Admin
sblair is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Master Fader accross Rdm implementation Question berntd RDM General Implementation Discussion 1 May 9th, 2008 12:12 AM
Welcome to the RDM General Implementation Discussion Forum sblair RDM General Implementation Discussion 0 May 31st, 2006 10:38 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.